The problem
- Owners: changing rules and unsuitable criteria can trigger complaints or document rework.
- Bidders: flawed securities or missing personnel, contract and supporting records can lead to rejection.
- Hundreds of pages make manual criteria checks and price comparisons difficult.
The solution
- Owners: prepare tender/RFP documents, evaluate or appraise as separate tasks.
- Bidders: review submissions and compliance matrices to identify gaps and clarification needs.
AI assistance
- Assist with criteria extraction, checklists, bid cross-checks and draft price comparisons; specialists review source evidence.
Deliverables
- Project owners: tender/RFP documents; evaluation or appraisal reports as separate tasks.
- Bidders: compliance matrix and bid review comments.
Package price · owner selection cost reference; consultancy quoted separately. Bidder review: scoped quotation.
Cost basis
Decree 214/2025/NĐ-CP, Article 14: tender/RFP preparation and bid evaluation each 0.2% of package price; tender/RFP and award appraisal each 0.1%. The displayed totals combine two tasks before individual conditions and limits.
Article 14(2): outsourced consultant fees are not based on these selection cost rates. This is an owner-side reference, not mandatory consultancy pricing or a bidder-side bid review rate. Preparation/evaluation and appraisal are separate tasks, not an assumed combined appointment.
Where construction tender consultancy norms apply, consult Tables 2.21–2.23, Appendix VIII, Circular 38/2026/TT-BXD, by package type and contracted scope.
Decree 214/2025 · Article 14TT 38/2026/TT-BXDPhụ lục VIII / Appendix VIII